Maybe not the scope you are hoping for, but I think you might find it interesting.
If you are going off vibes, you can say that. It’s good that you want to approach the information you have access to critically. Be skeptic, but also be measured in your commentary, even more so if you have limited information. Like, for Souligny, you could have went:
I’m really partial to a Souligny alignment. It’s surprising that even though this option has been mentioned so often, even all the way back to the 80s, that I couldn’t find much on it from the ARTM. I’m curious, maybe I’ll make an access to information request to the ARTM about this option.